IPC to BNS Section Mapper
Compare IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act sections with BNS, BNSS and BSA for Indian law study.
Practise structured witness-question planning with AI-assisted cross-examination preparation for Indian law students.
Open Cross-Examination PreparationThese introductions are public. Using the tools requires a Settl account and workspace; AI requests use firm credits.
Last updated 7 October 2026
Provide the witness context, disputed facts and relevant case materials.
Review suggested lines of questioning and refine them against the record.
For a mock trial, group questions by chronology, source of knowledge and inconsistencies rather than using an unstructured list.
Questions require review for relevance, fairness and evidentiary rules. AI suggestions are not a litigation strategy or legal advice.
Cross-examination tests a witness’s account against the record. The tool reads the witness statement or chief examination you provide along with the case materials, and proposes lines of questioning grouped by purpose: fixing the chronology, testing the source of the witness’s knowledge, and putting prior inconsistent statements. Each line points to the document or passage it relies on so you can check it.
It is meant for students in mock trial competitions and trial advocacy clinics, and for anyone studying how the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam rules on leading questions and contradiction apply in practice.
In a mock trial on a road accident claim, the eyewitness says in chief that the car was speeding at 7:30 pm. The police statement records the time as 8:15 pm and places the witness inside a shop. The tool suggests a chronology line fixing where the witness was, a knowledge line on visibility, and a contradiction line putting the earlier statement after drawing the witness’s attention to it, as Section 148 BSA requires. In a criminal trial, a statement recorded by police under Section 180 BNSS can be used only to contradict the witness under Section 181 BNSS. You trim the questions to short leading ones and decide not to ask the final “why” question.
Yes. Section 146 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (formerly Section 143 of the Evidence Act) permits leading questions in cross-examination, subject to the court’s control over improper or scandalous questions.
It suggests lines to consider. Choosing, ordering and limiting questions is your decision and should be reviewed against the record.
Yes. Fictional statements and moot materials are the recommended way to practise with this tool.
Compare IPC, CrPC and Evidence Act sections with BNS, BNSS and BSA for Indian law study.
Build structured study notes from Indian judgments with AI-assisted summaries of facts, issues and reasoning.
Explore estimated court fees by Indian state, matter type and claim value for filing preparation and study.
Study consumer complaint jurisdiction and limitation using structured preparation tools for Indian consumer disputes.
Organise facts, dates, issues and documents into an AI-assisted hearing brief for moots and supervised internships.
Study structured Indian legal document templates and practise notices, applications and pleadings with reviewable drafts.
Use fictional matters, published judgments or material you are authorised to handle. Settl is an assisted negotiation and case management tool, not a law firm. Not Legal Advice.